Woody 2000

Evaluation of the Project Woody 2000 by ´ Bruno Tome Santos Feitor Frederico Ferreira do Cabeco ¸

Mestrado em Engenharia Electrot´cnica-Telecomunica¸˜es e co U. C. de Gest˜o de Projecto a Professor Rui Rijo

Departamento de Engenharia Electrot´cnica e Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gest˜o a Instituto Polit´cnico de Leiria e

Janeiro 2012

List of Figures
1 2 3 4 Project Woody 2000 Work Breakdown Structure Project Woody 2000 Milestone Bar Chart. . . . Project organization chart. . . . . . . . . . . . . Process changes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (WBS). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 14 18 24

List of Tables
1 2 Building project implementation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Responsibility Chart for Effective Control. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Contents
1 Project Concept and Strategy 1.1 Was the Woody 2000 project well-conceived? Give reasons for your opinion. (1a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 What were Woody’s real objectives that could and should have been articulated? (1b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3 What strategies were there for achieving these objectives? What would you recommend? (1c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.4 Did they consider other solutions? Give Examples. (1d) . . . . . . . . . . 1.5 How would you gauge the project’s success? Could success be measured? If so, when? (1e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . . . 7 7 8 8 8

2 Project Scope 9 2.1 Why do you suppose renovation of the President and Executive Vice President’s offices were included in the project and was that a good idea? (2a) 9 2.2 Write a simple project scope statement. (2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2.1 Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9