English as a global language, a good or bad thing?
by AnnaMaria Smolander
The English language is everywhere. The language of most of the Internet sites around the world is English. We are using this language to write our articles on this site, even though I am positive that English is not the first language of everybody using this website. It is not my first language, I come from Finland. Ilearned English at school. It is the most widely studied language in the world.
It is the language of media, medicine and business. Computing uses English as does the international airtraffic control. But is the spread of this language a good thing or a bad one, is the spread of one such a powerful language a disadvantage or an advantage?
This is a difficult question to answer. Academics inthe field of linguistics have tried to find the best solution for this puzzle for decades now. One disadvantage which is often mentioned in this context is the fact that many languages have died because of the spread of English. Many still have lost a large number of speakers and are bound to be doomed in the near future. These are the disadvantages, and while they certainly seem gloomy, there aremany advantages of having a global language.
Doctors, for instance, from around the world can communicate with each other while using one language. As a consequence of numerous people knowing this language there are less misunderstandings which of course in medicine could be fatal. People from all corners of the world can communicate easier because they share a common language. Media can moreeasily tell us the most recent news from all over the world. People can use the Internet as a tool for research, which means more people are being educated about different issues.
I am happy that my son will speak this wonderful language as his first language, I am sure that I will learn a lot from him when he enters school in the UK. However, I wish that my son would also be able to speakFinnish as this is my mother tongue. It is important for a person's identity to remember their roots, and language is a very integral part of one's identity. Are people whose languages are being lost because of the dominance of the English language losing their identities then? As you can see
the question is a difficult one to answer, and in my opinion there is no right or wrong answer.
Brazil isthe 21stcentury power to watch
When I appeared on a panel of journalists from international publications recently, the moderator asked us to nominate our big story for the next year.
One of the panellists suggested the UK parliamentary elections. A second mentioned the continued ramifications of the financial crisis. I said Brazil, which I was about to visit for the first time.
Consider, Isaid: Brazil had come through the financial crisis in reasonable shape. It was sitting on a vast deepsea oil find . It had just seen the world's biggest stock market listing this year the $8bn flotation of part of the Brazilian arm of Santander. It would also be host to the world's two biggest sporting events: the 2014 football World Cup and the 2016 Olympic Games which Rio de Janeiro hadwon this month over Tokyo, Madrid and Chicago.
Yet as I sat on my flight to Rio, I could not suppress some trepidation at the country's well-known drawback. "Violence and crime can occur anywhere and often involve firearms or other weapons," the British Foreign Office travel advice on Brazil says. "Cases of carjacking occur, sometimes with the occupants being taken and forced to withdraw moneyfrom their accounts at cash machines."
As for public transport: "There have been instances where gangs have set buses alight leaving passengers inside after robbing them," the Foreign Office said.
Official advice is often frightening. Should the worst happen, governments do not want you saying they should have warned you.
But old Brazil hand Peter Robb was no more reassuring. Brazil was...
Ler documento completo
Por favor, assinar para o acesso.