English debate

What do you want to do? Do you want to change the entire course of history and human development by forcing English as truly universal, global spoken language?
• English should not be the global language because that would destroy the diversity of languages that world gives to us.
• With the time people using English or another global language they will forget about their native tongue and maybe they’re going to think that English is easier that their native language.
• Many places around the world will be against giving into this linguistic homogenization because they don’t want to give up of their culture, heritage and history just to help in creation of one global language.
• Language itself shows the culture and history of the country and it has been proven that speaking multiple languages can benefit people
• I think that all languages are important and should not exist a language that is superior to the others, it would be unfair.
• It will be difficult to find any group of people in the world willing to make that sacrifice.

During the EU, just making the Euro's cost over 20 years. A more complicated matter of language will take a lot of time. Also, language itself is our culture. If we ruin it, it will mean the loss of each country's uniqueness, and there will be a huge revolt about making one language
Translation is not always successful in preserving ideas or literary constructions, meaning cultural diversity may be