Avaliação de impacto ambiental

Principais idéias do texto

As três principais ideais do texto são a descrição das três abordagens existentes na avaliação de impactos significativos, a possibilidade de combinação entre essas três abordagens e como essas combinações devem ser feitas para que dêem certo.

Análise da referência bibliográfica

A bibliografia consta de artigos científicos, documentos governamentais, livros e capítulos de livros, sendo que aproximadamente metade é de 1983-1999 e a outra metade de 2000-2007.

Referência Bibliográfica

Australian Government. 2006. EPBC act policy statement 1.1 significance impact guidelines: matters of national environmental significance, department of the environment and heritage.

Baines J, Morgan B. 2003. Buckenham B. From technology-focused rules to socially responsible implementation: an SIA of proposed home heating rules in Christchurch, New Zealand. Impact Assess Proj Apprais; 21:187–94.

Beanlands GE,Duinker PN. 1983. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada, federal environmental assessment review office and institute for resource and environmental studies.

Beckwith JA. 2000. Social impact assessment: can it deliver? Paper presented to the annual meeting of the international association for impact assessment.

Bronfman LM. 1991. Setting the social impact agenda: an organizational perspective. Environ Impact Asses Rev;11:69–79.

Buchan D. 2011. Buy-in and social capital: by-products of social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais; 21:168–72.

Burdge RJ, Vanclay F. 1996. Social impact assessment: a contribution to the state of the art series. Impact Assess;14:59–86.

Canter LW. 1996. Environmental impact assessment. second ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Canter LW, Canty GA. 1996. Impact significance determination—basic considerations and a sequenced approach. Environ Impact Asses;13:275–97.

Cloquell-Ballester V, Monterde-Díaz R, Cloquell-Ballester V, Santamarima-Siurana M. 2007.